Price discrimination
Price discrimination exists when sales of identical goods are transacted at
different prices from a single vendor. Theoretically, price discrimination
is a feature only of monopoly markets. In addition to a monopoly market,
price discrimination requires some means to discourage discount customers
from becoming resellers and by extension competitors. This usually entails
either keeping the different price groups separate, making price comparisons
difficult, or restricting pricing information. The boundary set up by the
marketer to keep segments separate are referred to as a rate fence.
There are three types of price discrimination:
* In first degree price discrimination, price varies by customer. This
arises from the fact that the value of goods is subjective. A customer
with low price elasticity is less deterred by a higher price than a
customer with high price elasticity of demand. As long as the price
elasticity (in absolute value) for a customer is less than one, it is
very advantageous to increase the price: the seller gets more money for
less goods. With an increase of the price the price elasticity tends to
rise above one. One can show that in the optimum the price, as it
varies by customer, is inversely proportional to one minus the
reciprocal of the price elasticity of that customer at that price. This
assumes that the consumer passively reacts to the price set by the
seller, and that the seller knows the demand curve of the customer. In
practice however there is a bargaining situation, which is more
complex: the customer may try to influence the price, e.g. by
pretending to like the product less than he or she really does, and by
"threatening" not to buy it.
* In second degree price discrimination, price varies according to
quantity sold. Larger quantities are available at a lower unit price.
* In third degree price discrimination, price varies by location or by
customer segment. See economics of location.
In economic terms,the purpose of price discrimination is to capture the
market's consumer surplus. This surplus arises because, in a market with a
single clearing price, some customers (the very low price elasticity
segment) would have been prepared to pay more than the single market price.
Price discrimination transfers some of this surplus from the consumer to the
producer/marketer.
It can be proved mathematically, that a firm facing a downward sloping
demand curve that is convex to the origin will always obtain higher revenues
under price discrimination than under a single price strategy. This can also
be shown diagramaticly.
[alt text]
Sales revenue without and with Price Discrimination
In the top diagram, a single price (P) is available to all customers. The
amount of revenue is represented by area P,A,Q,O. The consumer surplus is
the area above line segment P,A but below the demand curve (D).
With price discrimination, (the bottom diagram), the demand curve is divided
into two segments (D1 and D2). A higher price (P1) is charged to the low
elasticity segment, and a lower price (P2) is charged to the high elasticity
segment. The total revenue from the first segment is equal to the area
P1,B,Q1,O. The total revenue from the second segment is equal to the area
E,C,Q2,Q1. The sum of these areas will always be greater than the area
without discrimination assuming the demand curve resembles a rectangular
hyperbola with unitary elasticity. The more prices that are introduced, the
greater the sum of the revenue areas, and the more of the consumer surplus
is captured by the producer.
Note that the above requires both first and second degree price
discrimination: the right segment corresponds partly to different people
than the left segment, partly to the same people, willing to buy more if the
product is cheaper.
It is very useful for the price discriminator to determine the optimum
prices in each market segment. This is done in the next diagram where each
segment is considered as a separate market with its own demand curve. As
usual, the profit maximizing output (Qt) is determined by the intersection
of the marginal cost curve (MC) with the marginal revenue curve for the
total market (MRt).
The firm decides what amount of the total output to sell in each market.
This is determined from the marginal revenue curves in each market. The
intersection of the total market price with the marginal revenue curves in
each market yields optimum outputs of Qa and Qb. From the demand curve in
each market we can determine the profit maximizing prices of Pa and Pb.
Price skimming is a type of price discrimination. It is price discrimination
over time. Typically a company starts selling a new product at a relatively
high price then gradually reduces the price as the low price elasticity
segment gets satiated.
A closely related concept is yield management. In price discrimination firms
charge different prices depending on who buys the product, who buys what
quantities, and who buys in what locations. In some jurisdictions this is
illegal. In yield management, firms charge different prices depending on
minor variations in the product. These firms typically engage in product
differentiation. They modify their product offerings so that each product is
optimized for a particular target market. Hense charging a business
traveller three times the cost of an economy airplane seat is not price
discrimination. It is yield management because the product is different
(larger seats, and better food than economy class). Typically yield
management groupings are at the aggregate, rather than individual, level.
When a market segment is charged one price, they are said to be in a price bucket.
This content from Wikipedia is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
|
|